I feel that there should be more detail and information. I also feel that you need to spice it up a little. For example different fonts, colors and graphics.
I thought it was interesting but like I said above it needed more detail.
I would not explore here but I would explore somewhere else.
Mar 01, 2009 Rating
Global Warming by: Anonymous
I feel there is something missing. Not enough information. I do like the issues that where covered.
It was interesting but I feel that there should be more details.
No I would not like to explore more of this site.
Mar 01, 2009 Rating
Global Warming by: Anonymous
I really enjoyed the article on global warming. I really liked the issues that where discussed. I especially liked the issue about money and politics.
The reason why liked this issue is because whoever is in power at the time always says that they do not have enough money to help with global warming. I think it is time to step in and make changes into our everyday lives since the government will not help much.
No I would not like to explore the site anymore.
Mar 01, 2009 Rating
More Analysis by: Robert
I would have liked to have seen some more analysis on the cause and effects of certain actions. I wasn't convinced by the responses.
Also in terms of formatting on the page, maybe is a good idea to link the question to the responses. Its a little annoying to scroll up and down.
And move the graph off to the side, if you want to grab my attention I'd say bump up the text. Just a suggestion.
Mar 01, 2009 Rating
global warming by: Anonymous
I really appreciate the content written by the author. It is obviously an alarming issue and author has provided nice little evidences to this.
Mar 01, 2009 Rating
Global Warming by: Anonymous
It's not clear to me what the author of the post is trying to say.Anyways global warming is an issue which has to be taken care of.
Jan 09, 2009 Rating
Why are you asking? by: Arielle
My first thought on seeing this post was that the author is fishing for the answers to a school assignment. "Shauna" doesn't seem very authoritative. The chart would have been better if the caption said where it came from. However, the response seems well-thought out and useful.
The site looks a little amateurish (on Firefox anyway). It could benefit from better care taken on the typography in the links. It seems superficial of me, but it makes me doubt the accuracy of the data. So I wouldn't look at it the way it is now, but if I thought it held useful and accurate information I would come back to it.
Jan 08, 2009 Rating
A Reasoned View by: Anonymous
It was quite interesting and the viewpoint was calm and the upshot really was "who the hell knows?" which is about the truest thing one can say. I think the ozone hole is the most important item in this quandry since I think we are all going to burn up if it doesn't stop getting larger. That, we may (probably)have caused. The rest could be, as suggested, a cycle which cannot be altered by puny us. But, hey, politically we need to get off foreign oil, etc., so why not hang it on the warming theory. It won't hurt and IT COULD BE TRUE. At any rate, it's good for people to honor the earth and it's beauty. It improves their characters.
Jan 08, 2009 Rating
Needs improvement by: Anonymous
My first impression I like this site but it is not well designed.
The information is very interesting and more useful for all.
I would like to know more on this topic.
This sites has lot of information useful for all. It is mainly about the weather and climatic conditions.
Jan 08, 2009 Rating
Could use improvement by: Gretchen
My first impression is that the page is not as attractive as it could be.
I do think the information is interesting, but could be presented in a different manner to make it more appealing.
I'm intregued enough to explore the site more.
If I were to search, I would look for ways to share this information with my friends.
