[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines


Home
Air News
EZine Sign me Up
About Us
Employment
Intro to Weather
Weather Equipment
Upper Atmosphere
Satellites
Radar
Canadian Weather
Let it Snow!
Search
Global Warming
More Global Warming
YOUR Website
Site Map
Air Quality
Environment in Asia
Privacy Policy
 

Which air dispersion model to use


More ideas for air dispersion model users...


Scientists use a technology called an air (or air quality) dispersion model to help decide how to preserve our environment. Models have evolved over several decades now and we now have a number of different approaches to the types of problems at hand. How does a modeller know which type of air dispersion model is the most appropriate for any particular project? Here, we address the benefits of the air puff model such as CALPUFF, a more recent development.

Air Dispersion Model

EPA advocates CALPUFF for applications involving longer plume transport, typically 50 km or greater. Consequently, using CALPUFF for EPA regulatory applications for shorter distances may require appropriate examination by the authorities, although CALPUFF has been strongly favored for general applications lately. If you look back at the April 2000 EPA Guideline on Air Quality Models, it says that CALPUFF can also be used in special cases, including complicated stack emissions. The appropriate regulatory affair professionals will look at these on a case-by-case basis and help the regulatory and compliance consultants decide which is best for the situation.

CALPUFF, Aermod or ISC?

Technically, puff air pollution modeling can be used for the majority of applications where a plume model such as Aermod or ISC will suffice,
but it might not be worth the extra resources required. The scientific criteria used to choose whether to use puff or steady-state air pollution modeling for each application might depend on whether the straight-line, nominal assumptions on which the simpler plume-flow simulation is based are acceptable.

This can include domain size and potential for space- and time-varying three-dimensional fields of flow influenced by complex terrain, nonuniform distribution of land use and coastal effects. Additionally, calm or low wind speeds with variable directions may characterize the flows.

For cases which include a high degree of the three-dimensional flow changeability near boundary limits (either upslope or downslope or along winding river valleys) the steady-state assumption might not be very good beyond the limits of even a few thousand metres. Here, the CALPUFF air dispersion model would be far more accurate.

There's one more thing to take into account: when deciding which model is best for each situation, ask whether three-dimensional or temporal distribution of air contaminants matters. This question becomes valid when using the air dispersion model to evaluate risk or when results are to be used for the study of criteria air contaminants where only the peak concentration is important, independent of time or space.

Again, CALPUFF has received stronger support in later years, with the use of some steady-state air dispersion model software, such as ISC, being phased out completely in many jurisdictions.

The modelling software is available for free at this US government webpage: http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm - and it is very complicated to learn. Manufacturers and design engineering firms often use atmospheric consultants to work with these tools. They understand the problems and find efficient solutions to avoid harm to the environment.

Need help with this? Try the services of a good air quality and emissions firm for your situation. Call Barry at Calvin Consulting at 403-547-7557 or email - info @ calvinconsulting.ca (remove spaces).

Go back from Air Dispersion Model to the

Can you do it better?

You like this Idea? It works for its intended purpose, but probably is not perfect. Why not?

Do you know of a better one? We'd all like to see it, I'll bet. A penny for your thoughts.

What shall we call it?

And What's it all About? [ ? ]

If you've got a picture... [ ? ]

Add a Picture/Graphic Caption (optional) 

Click here to upload more images (optional)

Author Information (optional)

To receive credit as the author, enter your information below.

Your Name

(first or full name)

Your Location

(ex. City, State, Country)

Submit Your Contribution

Check box to agree to these submission guidelines.


(You can preview and edit on the next page)

Other people and their ideas...

Click below to see hi-tech contributions from other visitors to this page...

Air Pollution Air Quality Air Dispersion  starstarstar
Air pollution dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer ...

CALPUFF Training  star
The developer of this model, Joe Scire at TRC Solutions, periodically announces training courses in collaboration with The University of South Florida ...

Feedback  Not rated yet
I just went throgh this really all the points which came to my mind are covered by you. No more additions if you bring this to practise it will sound ...

CALPUFF air  Not rated yet
using dispersion method, You are purifying the air i think it is the best idea but the contaminents of this purified air should concern.

Barry's Response ...

Benefits of the use of calpuff air model  Not rated yet
I have no idea what we are writing about here. This article makes no sense and I have learned nothing from it.

I have never heard of any of these ...

MY THINKING  Not rated yet
Why do you model for air quality?? What is important and what models do you use?

Barry's Response - The most popular choice for a long time was ...

calpuff air  Not rated yet
I agree that the steady-state model would not be great when used for distances extending greater than a few kilometres. And that more advanced models such ...

technical article  Not rated yet
pretty technical article, but i'm sure there are people that find it helpful. :)

Barry's Response - Thanks, Wine, and I'm sure many readers, such ...

Air Quality Testers web page, or visit the Stuff in the Air homepage.
Search this site for more information now.



New! Comments

Do you like what you see here? Please let us know in the box below.

Have your Say...

Technology and Environment. What do you know about it? Here's you chance to tell us...Go ahead: Have your Say - whether it is weather monitoring equipment, dispersion modelling or something even more fantastic.

You can even comment on what other people have said...no registration or login required.



Get the Newsletter
Blowin' in the Wind

Enter your E-mail Address

Enter your First Name (optional)

Then

Don't worry -- your e-mail address is totally secure.
I promise to use it only to send you Blowin' in the Wind.


See the newsletter chronicles.



ADD TO YOUR
SOCIAL BOOKMARKS:


add to BlinkBlink
add to Del.icio.usDel.icio.us
add to DiggDigg
add to FurlFurl
add to GoogleGoogle
add to SimpySimpy
add to SpurlSpurl
Bookmark at TechnoratiTechnorati
add to YahooY! MyWeb

More Social Networking
at bottom of page



Always wanted your own website?

Check out how to start a web site business.