[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

Home
Air News
EZine Sign me Up
About Us
Employment
Intro to Weather
Weather Equipment
Upper Atmosphere
Satellites
Radar
Canadian Weather
Let it Snow!
Search
Global Warming
More Global Warming
YOUR Website
Site Map
Air Quality
Environment in Asia
Privacy Policy
 

Can I do better

by biggie360@hotmail.com
(anchorage alaska)

Motor Development International OneFlowAir Car

Motor Development International OneFlowAir Car

the entire automotive industry has already done better. Compressed air is a stupid choice for automotive fuel. You would need to (somehow) compress it to about 800,000PSI in order to maintain the same energy/volume ratio as gasoline.

Also, the simple act of compressing air is about 20% efficient AT BEST, and that energy has to come from somewhere. After the 80% energy loss of compressing the air, we would see another loss as the compressed air is decompressed to power the car.

I have seen these engines run effectively while usefully producing about 40% of the potential power stored in the compressed air tanks.

Seriously? You expect a car built out of pure STUPID to save the world?

Barry's Response - Perhaps these are reasons why the compressed air car has not been as popular as one might think. If these statements are true, they present serious practical issues in making these cars a viable (and reliable) medium of transportation.

That's not to say it warrants abandoning all research. Just that there's still a ways to go. Can I do better? We shall find out.

Comments for
Can I do better

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Feb 05, 2010
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
mebe
by: Charlie

Air is not all good. But the battery for the Tesla weighs .4T, it cost AUD 25k and only lasts ~ 3 years... and it recently broke the distance record here in Oz at 500 km/ charge - WITHOUT THE AC ON - and with the windscreen wiper set vertical to minimise drag..

Carbon fibre tanks cost about $3000, they weigh ? - 30kg and if designed to be fatigue free will be as good in 100 years as they are now.

And range? - carry more carbon tanks, or swop them at gas - air! stations like we do gas cylinders now.

And we can charge them directly with wind powered compressors. Truly carbon neutral.

> aircar, airbike, airtruck, airboat, .... airplane, aircopter?

Any comments out there - ?

Charlie

charlie.madden@internode.on.net

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Hi-Tech Idea






Get the Newsletter

Blowin' in the Wind

Enter your E-mail Address

Enter your First Name (optional)

Then

Don't worry -- your e-mail address is totally secure.
I promise to use it only to send you Blowin' in the Wind.


See the newsletter chronicle.



ADD TO YOUR
SOCIAL BOOKMARKS:


add to BlinkBlink
add to Del.icio.usDel.icio.us
add to DiggDigg
add to FurlFurl
add to GoogleGoogle
add to SimpySimpy
add to SpurlSpurl
Bookmark at TechnoratiTechnorati
add to YahooY! MyWeb

More Social Networking
at bottom of page



Always wanted your own website?

Check out how to start a web site business.