Dietary effect on Supply and Demand

by Subadra

No Bull!

No Bull!

On your global warming pie graph it shows that agricultural bi-products is 12.5 percent. Then it continues to show that it is a 40% contributer of methane. Methane is produced by livestock of the agricultural sector. You multiple this by 21 times in global warming effect calculations (because methane is 21 times more effective than carbon dioxide at acting as a greenhouse gas) and this is a significant contributer to global warming.

I think if we decrease demand for meat and increase the demand for organic vegetables we will have decreased methane emissions. We would also have made the world more sustainable because increasing vegetables in our diet decreases our height on the food chain thereby lessening our impact.

The UN has accepted livestock as a major contributer to global warming and might be considering lowering subsidies for that sector.

Barry's Response - That's good thinking, Subadra. Diets that are more vegetarian are more healthy as well, you could have noted. We can really get all of our nutritional needs from plant material. And what's good for us and good for our planet must be good in general. Thank you for your input.

No doubt about it, though. Those of us who enjoy our meat, really enjoy their meat and it will be a major change for anyone to give that up suddenly. A reasonable reduction may happen over time. See the movie Food Inc. sometime.

Search this site for more information now.

Click here to post comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Cause of Global Warming.

ADD TO OTHER SOCIAL BOOKMARKS: add to add to DiggDiggadd to SpurlSpurl

Are you concerned about Air Pollution in your area?

Maybe modelling air pollution will get you the answers you need for this problem.

That's what I do full-time.  Try it.

Have your Say...

on the StuffintheAir         facebook page

See the newsletter chronicle.