My Rainforest Experience

by Ryan

Tropical vegetation at night.

Tropical vegetation at night.

I have visited both tropical and temperate Rain forests and I find it so appalling that they are being cut down.

I've visited temperate Rain forests in the Pacific Northwest and tropical rain forests along the Amazon River in Peru. Both forests were completely green, filled with enormous amounts of wet plants, trees, shrubs, and leaves and tons of different animals. When I was in Peru we saw snakes, frogs, and tons of unfamiliar insects. It baffles my mind that people can cut down parts of rich, lush ecosystems that so greatly affect our lives.

While I never experienced rain forest destruction first-hand, I am somewhat familiar with the processes of rain forest destruction and clear cutting. While I’ve never seen the movie The Lorax, I read the book as a child. I did, however, watch a movie called Fern Gully: The Last Rainforest, that first informed me about the tragic destruction that occurs to rain forests and all of the plants and animals that are tragically demolished. I’ve also seen Rain Forest protection and awareness in certain museums or aquariums, or other products that assist with Rain Forest protection.

While I’m not sure what will get corporations and companies to stop demolished so much of the forest, I do believe that a little can go a long way. If people are more informed about what is happening to Rain Forests, and how much of a impact they really do have on our lives, maybe they will make a difference.


Barry's Response - Wanna see something scary?

https://youtu.be/qYlBbLDL5dE

It's a modern real-life version of those fictional clear-cutting machines shown in the The Lorax.


Search this site for more information now.

Where the air starts, my rainforest experience

"My Rainforest Experience" is more than a vacation snap; it's a profound immersion in the largest biogenic air laboratory on earth. It's not just green - it's a chemical factory regulating global climate and purifying air thousands of kilometers away. The destruction may be "baffling," but somehow, meteorology explains its terrifying consequences.

Invisible Clouds: Rainforests and Atmospheric Science

Through two critical mechanisms, a healthy rainforest creates its own weather and cleans the air:

1) The Biogenic Vapor Wash (BVOCs): The fresh, piney smell of the rainforest comes from volatile organic compounds like isoprene and terpenes. Healthy ecosystems have these chemical signatures. The BVOCs react with hydroxyl radicals to scrub out man-made pollution like NOx and ground-level ozone in the upper canopy. This natural cleaning cycle dies when a rainforest gets destroyed, making regional air quality worse.

2) Your "wet plants" are constantly releasing moisture. As a natural lubricant for the atmosphere, evapotranspiration introduces huge amounts of water vapor into the air. This moisture feeds distant aquatic ecosystems, keeping rainfall far from the jungle. Forest cutting weakens the planetary boundary layer, reducing localized cooling and disrupting the regional moisture transport system.

We map the invisible scents of nature. Don't just save a tree, save the air it cleans.

A Case for Freedom of Thought: The Great Green Contradiction

According to the mainstream view, every tree saves carbon. Research shows mature tropical forests are often carbon neutral or have a slower absorption rate than young, rapidly growing ones. The value of the mature rainforest lies in its BVOCs and biodiversity, not just its carbon storage. Credible counter-narratives acknowledge:
  • Agroforestry (new, fast-growing trees) can theoretically absorb more CO2 than old growth for skeptics advocating economic growth.
  • Nevertheless, integrity and stewardship demand that we protect the entire, irreplaceable ecosystem because its BVOCs and rain-making power sustain regional air and water-values that go far beyond carbon accounting.

Symphony of the Sick Tree: The Revolutionary Experience

Make the invisible destruction terrifyingly real to revolutionize engagement:

1) For instance, we could design "Acoustic Air Quality Audit" (Interactive/Audio): Create a high-fidelity audio experience where a user hears the sounds of a rainforest. The beautiful ambient sounds of the area are replaced by a cacophony of pollutants: the engine noise of the log harvester and an unnerving, high-frequency sonic representation of the invisible BVOCs vanishing and the NOx levels rising as the user clicks. An irresponsible act feels immediate this way.

2) Maybe it would make more sense to suppose that every company that buys rainforest products must fund the deployment of IoT (Internet of Things) sensors that detect and quantify BVOCs. Real-time data would let consumers see how the forest and air are doing. The land is deemed "dead" if the BVOCs drop below a certain threshold. High-tech science meets ethical responsibility.

We need to stop thinking of "My Rainforest Experience" as just a place to see rare animals and start thinking of it as the planet's living air conditioner and chemical sponge.

Did you know rainforest smells clean your air?

Would you pay more for a product if you could see a real-time air quality audit for it and the company behind it? Which fictional clear-cutting machine scared you the most from The Lorax or Fern Gully?

Comments for My Rainforest Experience

Average Rating starstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Rating
starstarstarstarstar 		Misleading
by: A Logger's Wife

I found your post very interesting although upon first impression I thought the post was on a completely different subject. :) Rain forests are a very important factor in our world however many people fail to realize their importance and choose not to care about it at all rather than do any research. Others, do what they can and hope to leave impressions along the way. That being said, I'm married to a logger, his dad was a logger and his dad's dad was a logger. No, he doesn't go clear cutting forests however he does clear cut typically for Weyerhauser companies and they use the wood for papers and such. Required essentials.

Anyhow, my point is that not all loggers are the same. The companies my husband works for comes behind the loggers and replants the area with new trees (mainly pine) and its a cycle they've had for years. So, while not all loggers are "bad loggers", there are some out there and its very important to know where to point fingers at.

I hope that in time, there will be enough of us to stand up and stop demolition of forests and find new, unique ways to make various things that do not require harming our environment!

Barry's Response - I hope most of us know that not all harvesters do so irresponsibly.

Thanks for sharing this important perspective. And thanks for pointing out the difference between sustainable forest management (the "cycle they've had for years") and permanent conversion logging. Replanting immediately is part of your husband's company's integrity and stewardship, acknowledging the land's value beyond a harvest.

Let's inject some atmospheric science into your "new trees (mainly pine)" - it's surprisingly controversial. Because pine forests are high in conifers, they emit lots of terpenes, which are powerful Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOCs). As we've discussed, BVOCs act as natural atmospheric detergents. Science reveals a contentious trade-off:

1) Secondary Organic Aerosols (SOAs) are formed when terpenes from your new pine forest react in the atmosphere. They scatter sunlight and cool the area a little, mitigating the warming effect of CO2. Your replanted forest is actively generating cool, clean air.

2) BVOCs from pine react with human-made Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) from industry in polluted areas, causing ground-level ozone (smog) to form.

In other words, your managed pine cycle is a great example of a system that works, but it also shows how land-use decisions can affect air quality beyond CO2 capture. Replanting is great, but we need to monitor the BVOC-to-NOx ratio continuously to ensure the new forest is a net benefit to local air quality.
Rating
starstarstarstarstar 		The right of trees to live
by: cangel

The video about deforestation of rainforests was striking, and troubling. Your question is pertinent. How do we convince companies to stop destroying rainforests. Maybe we need to send them for conferences in the middle of a destroyed forest instead of at a resort. And then let them fend for themselves and forage what they can for shelter and food. Then they might understand that what they are doing affects the people living in these areas, and ultimately the rest of the world that is being deprived of the treasure they are destroying.

From Barry - Cangel, hosting a conference in the clearcut is a brilliant, poetic piece of performance art, drawing inspiration from both environmental activism and ethical, corporate immersion therapy. It speaks to our need for empathy that resource executives must personally experience the degradation and "forage for shelter and food" to grasp the impact on "the rest of the world."

If you want maximum discomfort and educational value, we can add a meteorological twist:

1) Aerosol Assault: Clearcuts, especially ones created by slash-and-burn, are exposed to high solar radiation. As a result of losing the forest's evapotranspiration engine, the local air temperature goes up a lot. Furthermore, the exposed, dry soil and ash are highly prone to resuspension of particulate matter. The corporate executives wouldn't just be deprived of shelter; they'd be forced to breathe air with significantly elevated levels of PM2.5 and PM10, the microscopic dust created by the devastation.

2) When they get there, they'll notice the "air quality" is off. My Rainforest Experience has lost its clean, complex scent of BVOCs, replaced by the acrid smell of burning or inert smell of dry soil. I think the contrast between the resort's air and the clearcut's air would be the most powerful speaker.

We'd be able to physically demonstrate that destroying a rainforest isn't just an aquatic problem (river), but an air pollution event that spreads globally.
Rating
starstarstar 		Thought provoking.
by: Anonymous

The article is well written and one feels the anguish that the writer had experienced and the concern that he feels about the destruction that is going on and what must be done about it. I have personally seen large stretches of pine forests being cut down, often illegally, by traders dealing with lumber.

I quite agree with the writer in that there is more awareness about what is happening to our environment. i do hope that the number of Government and voluntary agencies that are coming up for environmental preservation and management will be effective in what they do.

From Barry - Thanks for the "thought-provoking" feedback, Anonymous. Your anguish, shared by the original writer of "My Rainforest Experience," is a powerful, human reaction to seeing the blatant, illegal destruction of nature. It's hard to watch illegal traders cut down a resource that gives us life and clean air. Our hope is that government and voluntary agencies become more effective!

Let's explore how this destruction of pine forests creates a very specific, weird, and traceable air quality crime that's harder to hide:

💨 On the Scent of a trail: The Case of the Missing Pine Scent 🌲

Pine forests aren't just green, they're a constant source of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOCs), especially alpha-pinene.

1) This is where meteorology meets environmental forensics. Based on temperature and sunlight, you can estimate how much alpha-pinene a pine forest emits. BVOCs disappear from the local atmospheric boundary layer when a forest is illegally cleared.

2) PM2.5 Paradox: Illegal cutting often leaves slash (debris) or burns it. Satellites and ground sensors can track the plumes of Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) released by this act. The illegal logger leaves behind a double atmospheric signature: a massive, abnormal drop in clean, natural BVOCs, followed immediately by a spike in dirty combustion PM2.5.

This means that effective environmental agencies don't need to patrol every acre; they just need to use air quality consulting technology - like advanced gas chromatography and remote sensing - to find "missing pine scent" and "sudden smoke." It proves that illegal logging isn't just a land crime, but an invisible air pollution event that destroys the ability of the atmosphere to cleanse itself.

When you hope agencies become more effective, remember that science gives them the tools to smell and measure crime miles away!
Rating
starstarstar 		True, but....
by: Anonymous

It is unfortunate that logging and construction are depleting the rainforests.

But, it is important to remember that we are much more educated about the environment and the affects of our actions now than we were even 30 years ago. However, developing countries are still struggling for economic success and viability. Is it fair for developed nations to control the growth of those less fortunate? We created much of the problem and are now trying to control the spread of the disaster but also whole nations at the same time.

From Barry - You deserve serious praise for articulating this point so clearly in the whole environmental debate. Your appeal to justice and fairness challenges the right of the developed world to impose its environmental standards after its own period of industrial irresponsibility.

You're right about the weather:

1) Rich nations built their wealth with technologies (fossil fuels, clear-cutting) that emitted massive amounts of greenhouse gasses and pollution (sulphur, lead) into the atmosphere. It's called the "atmospheric debt."

2) When a developing nation clears forests for agriculture (often with fire) or uses older, cheaper fossil fuel technology, it releases aerosols (PM2.5) and Nitrogen/Sulphur Oxides (NOx and SOx). Everybody's affected by these pollutants, but the developing nation justifies the action as necessary for its own economic viability.

Not control, but compensation is the solution, which requires global freedom of thought. Developed nations should invest in technologies and financial mechanisms (like carbon credits for not deforestation) that make the responsible path more profitable than the destructive one.

We need to fund the transition to cleaner energy and sustainable land use in developing countries, acknowledging their right to economic success. Our ethical mandate isn't to police, but to empower them to skip the polluting industrial revolution.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Water Pollution.


Do you have concerns about air pollution in your area??

Perhaps modelling air pollution will provide the answers to your question.

That is what I do on a full-time basis.  Find out if it is necessary for your project.


Have your Say...

on the StuffintheAir         facebook page

Other topics listed in these guides:

The Stuff-in-the-Air Site Map

And, 

See the newsletter chronicle. 

Thank you to my research and writing assistants, ChatGPT and WordTune, as well as Wombo and others for the images.

OpenAI's large-scale language generation model (and others provided by Google and Meta), helped generate this text.  As soon as draft language is generated, the author reviews, edits, and revises it to their own liking and is responsible for the content.