We can't afford to loose our enviroment.

by Divjot
(India)

We live in a natural environment which means that it is quite vulnerable to external changes that we do. So we must be extremely careful when doing unpleasant activities that may harm it.

All the basic components of the environment viz. land, water and air are important because they are needed to sustain life on earth. We all must become aware of the fact that if we don't do something fast, our environment will gradually deteriorate and become unusable.

We can do a lot of things like using renewable sources of energy like sunlight (solar cells), bio gas etc. Every effort how small it may be will surely help us a bit to make our environment quite sustainable.

We can't blame our government alone, we are also equally responsible for that. Why should we use products that harm the society? I feel angry at people who say that keeping our environment is safe is the work of the government.

Are they handicapped in taking control of cleaning the environment themselves? If every one of us takes a bit of initiative for conserving our environment, there will be no need for the government to invest large amount of money.
So, I urge all users to make everyone aware the dire consequences which we arise if we don't start to do something soon.

Barry's Response - I hope we are not assuming the governments of the world shall take it upon themselves to save us from ourselves. They can (and do) provide direction and guidelines, and are there to represent the needs of their people and scientific principles. Thanks for your input, Divjot.

Search this site for more information now.

Here's why we can't afford to lose our environment

It's not bad morals, it's bad business. We need a solution so cheap and cool that everyone adopts it right away if we can't afford to lose our environment. It's about winning with ingenuity, not following rules. It's time to expose the science that proves environmental decay is the dumbest economic move ever.

Pollution is economic suicide, says science

💰 We need to stop calling these changes "changes" and start calling them measurable toxic liabilities.

1. A factory skipping a filter to save money releases tiny, toxic particulates ($\text{PM}_{2.5}$ and $\text{PM}_{10}$). Smoke isn't just invisible; poison is measurable. The wind blows these across communities, and toxicology shows they raise healthcare costs, damage crops, and reduce worker productivity. Over $150 billion is the annual health cost of air pollution in the US alone! The real cost of "losing" our environment. We're not environmentalists; we're actuaries (people who measure risk).
2. Aquatic Investment (Aquatic Environment): Skeptics and conservatives value property rights. Whenever industrial runoff pollutes a lake or coastal area, it instantly devalues everything around it. The cleanup-the remediation, the dredging, the habitat restoration-often costs hundreds of times more than prevention. It's also financially ruinous to violate the Christian principle of stewardship. Our water resources are liquid assets, not garbage dumps!

The Great Global Clean-Up Game: My Revolutionary Proposal

💡 One solar cell is like treating a gunshot with a Band-Aid. Think like an inventor and a debater.

• Zero-Waste Mandate: The real problem isn't waste; it's a lack of profitable technologies to turn waste into cash. What's my proposal? Waste-to-Value (WTV) market. It's illegal to bury industrial waste unless a company has tried and failed to sell it to another industry. This forces entrepreneurs to come up with interdisciplinary solutions, like turning industrial slag into high-grade building materials or capturing landfill methane to power cryptocurrency mining.
• Defiant Clean Air Art: Why is air quality consulting so expensive? We should open-source the best air dispersion modelling software and make it publicly visible. There's a real-time air quality score for every major polluter. Imagine a big public digital art installation that changes color based on a company's $\text{SO}_2$ emissions! Public shame and Freedom of Thought make environmental health a viral, unavoidable topic, forcing compliance.

It's time to embrace the rebellious, entrepreneurial spirit that built modern industry and turn it into a pure, profitable, and total environmental win. We can't afford to lose our environment. It costs too much, and honestly, it looks tacky.

Come join the revolution!

🗨️ Do you want to stop waiting and start inventing? Which polluting industry would you make pay for the "Great Global Clean-Up Game"? Tell me in the comments: what's the craziest, coolest invention you think could save us $1 trillion?