WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING
by CHRISTOPHER
(NEBRASKA)
Got a lot to do!
The power of local action: Stop shouting, start shoveling ๐ - Tired of complaining about the environment? Find out why cleaning up your own neighborhood is the best scientific power move and how local action changes the planet faster than any global protest.
What you say, Christopher? SAVE THE FUKIN ENVIRONMENT MAKE A STAMENT PIN YOURSELF TO TREES
PROTEST
Barry's Response - Well, I have a bridge to jump off first...
A
website to build.
A
Dispersion model to run.
A weather forecast to check.
A family to raise.
A business to direct.
A community to tend.
A
gig to play.
A life to live.
A planet to save? Well, that's a little heavy. Might need some help. This is probably something we should do together, anyway.
Search this site for more information now.
Inventor's Rebellion and WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
Christopher, I hear you screaming! I'm feeling that hot, magnificent, revolutionary rage that makes you want to duct-tape yourself to a giant redwood. That makes sense. It should be a scream in the headline. But protests are ancient history. We're scientists and inventors; we don't protest problems, we engineer solutions.
While you're protesting a tree, I'm designing a machine that eats pollution. What's the better use of a brilliant mind?
Applied science is my kind of activism
๐งช Want to "make a statement"? Patent it! This whole conversation and the article we referenced - the one about how
industry and the environment balance - show that stopping things doesn't work. Better things are needed.
- "Industry pollutes!" you shout.
- "Industry pays for pollution solutions!" I reply.
Our article champions stewardship as the core of environmental sociology. We're told to tend the garden, but it takes tools - and those tools come from clever technology, not government mandates. By seizing our freedom of thought, we come up with something.
A Problem with Wicked Minds
(Meteorology and Morality) ๐จManiSha from Kathmandu says humans have a wicked mind. That's harsh, but it's the raw emotion we have to deal with. Externalized costs are the problem, not wickedness.
Thanks to theoretical meteorology, when a factory releases particulate matter into the atmosphere,
the wind carries that pollution away from the factory owner's nose. Air quality consulting is in high demand because of dispersion. It's not that they don't care; it's that the science of air quality makes it easy to move the problem around.
Technology forces accountability.
Building a better world with the ultimate counter-narrative
Here's my sassy, controversial take: We don't need to save the world; we need to upgrade it.
- Instead of banning carbon, let's design a global CO2 (carbon dioxide) recycling economy. Excess CO2 gets pumped into massive greenhouses in the desert, where plants use it to grow food. Hunger and atmospheric balance are solved at the same time.
- Aquatic Argument: Skeptics say the ocean's size makes human waste irrelevant. Although the ocean is huge, I won't use that as an excuse to dump plastic. Let's invent autonomous, solar-powered Ocean Cleanup Drones that recycle plastic for a profit. Incentives solve the aquatic environment problem better than guilt ever could.
- Christopher, your protest should be in a lab, workshop, or server farm, designing scrubbers, filters, and catalysts that make pollution impossible.
Don't let saving the planet crush you. One person can't handle it. It's a job for a billion people, all exercising their unique talents. Using better, cleaner, and cheaper technology, we can compete with industry instead of protesting it. That's the only "statement" that matters.
Let's ask, "WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING NEXT?" instead of "WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING?"
Here's a question for you:
If you could invent one piece of technology right now to eliminate one pollutant, what would it be and why?